Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875683›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2025

Description of STRIVE-ON Study Protocol: Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104 (Nimodipine Injection for IV Infusion) Compared with Oral Nimodipine in Patients Hospitalized for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH): A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Trial (STRIVE-ON).

Alex H Choi, Sherry Y Chou, Andrew F Ducruet, W Taylor Kimberly, R Loch Macdonald, Alejandro A Rabinstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05995405 (Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05995405 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104 (Nimodipine Injection for IV Infusion) Compared with Oral Nimodipine in Patients Hospitalized for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH): a Prospective, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrace Therapeutics Inc.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsAneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH)ArmsGTX-104, Nimotop 30 MG Oral Capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex H ChoiDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurosurgery, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Sherry Y ChouDivision of Neurocritical Care, The Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew F DucruetNeurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
W Taylor KimberlyDivision of Neurocritical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
R Loch MacdonaldCommunity Regional Medical Center, Community Neurological Institute and Community Health Partners, Fresno, CA, USA. l.macdonald@gracetx.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-8070
Alejandro A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral nimodipine is the only drug approved in North America for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, bioavailability is variable and frequently poor, leading to fluctuations in peak plasma concentrations that cause dose-limiting hypotension. Furthermore, administration is problematic in patients who cannot swallow. An oral liquid formulation exists but causes diarrhea. An intravenous nimodipine formulation (GTX-104) has been developed that has bioavailability approaching 100% and is not affected by feeding or gastrointestinal absorption. GTX-104 causes less hypotension and has more consistent peak plasma concentrations than oral nimodipine in human volunteers. Herein, we describe the protocol of a prospective, randomized, open-label safety, and tolerability study of GTX-104 compared with oral nimodipine in patients with aSAH (Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104 [Nimodipine Injection for Intravenous Infusion] Compared with Oral Nimodipine; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05995405). The study is designed to seek approval of GTX-104 by the Food and Drug Administration 505(b)(2) pathway. Inclusion and exclusion criteria match the prescribing information for oral nimodipine and include adult patients with aSAH of all Hunt and Hess grades who can receive investigational product within 96 h of aSAH. Study participants at imminent risk of death will be excluded. Study participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive GTX-104 or oral nimodipine for up to 21 days. The primary end point is the proportion of study participants with clinically significant hypotension, defined as hypotension requiring treatment that has a reasonable likelihood of being due to investigational product as determined by an independent, blinded end point adjudication committee. No statistical analysis of the end point is planned. Secondary end points include all episodes of hypotension, all adverse events, delayed cerebral ischemia, rescue therapy, and suicidal ideation. Clinical and health economic outcomes include quality of life using the EuroQol 5-dimension/3-level, modified Rankin Scale score at 30 and 90 days after aSAH and hospital resource use. The planned sample size is 100 study participants across 25 sites in the United States and Canada.

Indexed as

Calcium Channel BlockersNimodipineSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasodilator AgentsAdministration, OralAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCalcium Channel BlockersNimodipineVasodilator AgentsCalcium channel antagonistCerebral aneurysmCerebral vasospasmClinical trialDelayed cerebral ischemiaNimodipineSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID39875683
PMCPMC12137520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.