Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875616›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Tumour hypoxia in driving genomic instability and tumour evolution.

Alexandru Suvac, Jack Ashton, Robert G Bristow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandru SuvacTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jack AshtonTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Robert G BristowTranslational Oncogenomics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Robert.Bristow@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-9544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumour hypoxia is a feature of all heterogenous solid tumours. Increased levels or subregions of tumour hypoxia are associated with an adverse clinical prognosis, particularly when this co-occurs with genomic instability. Experimental evidence points to the acquisition of DNA and chromosomal alterations in proliferating hypoxic cells secondary to inhibition of DNA repair pathways such as homologous recombination, base excision repair and mismatch repair. Cell adaptation and selection in repair-deficient cells give rise to a model whereby novel single-nucleotide mutations, structural variants and copy number alterations coexist with altered mitotic control to drive chromosomal instability and aneuploidy. Whole-genome sequencing studies support the concept that hypoxia is a critical microenvironmental cofactor alongside the driver mutations in MYC, BCL2, TP53 and PTEN in determining clonal and subclonal evolution in multiple tumour types. We propose that the hypoxic tumour microenvironment selects for unstable tumour clones which survive, propagate and metastasize under reduced immune surveillance. These aggressive features of hypoxic tumour cells underpin resistance to local and systemic therapies and unfavourable outcomes for patients with cancer. Possible ways to counter the effects of hypoxia to block tumour evolution and improve treatment outcomes are described.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityNeoplasmsTumor HypoxiaAnimalsHumansMutationTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.