Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875601›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025

Differential impact of frailty on surgical and non-surgical site complications in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Katsunobu Sakurai, Naoshi Kubo, Tatsuro Tamura, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Yutaka Tamamori, Junya Nishimura, Yasuhito Iseki, Takafumi Nishii, Toru Inoue, Masakazu Yashiro and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katsunobu SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan. m1157473@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4789-9207
Naoshi KuboDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Tatsuro TamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tsuyoshi HasegawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Yutaka TamamoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Izumi City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Junya NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Yasuhito IsekiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Takafumi NishiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Toru InoueDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Masakazu YashiroDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yukio NishiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, 2-13-22 Miyakojima-Hondori Miyakojima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 534-0021, Japan.
Tsubasa BitoDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyoshi MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the differential impact of frailty on surgical site complications (SSCs) and non-surgical site complications (non-SSCs) in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing gastrectomy.

methodsIn this study, frailty was assessed preoperatively using a frailty index (FI) in 395 patients scheduled for gastrectomy for GC between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups (high FI vs. low FI) to examine the impact of frailty on SSC and non-SSC.

resultsOverall complication and non-SSC rates were significantly higher in the high FI group, but the two groups had similar rates of SSC. In multivariate analysis, high FI, high BMI, and male were independent risk factors for non-SSC. The incidence of non-SSC was 0% in patients with no applicable risk factors, 3.6% in patients with one applicable risk factor, 13.0% in patients with two applicable risk factors, and 37.1% in patients with all three risk factors (Cochran-Armitage trend test, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of the risk prediction model using these three variables to predict non-SSC was 0.760.

conclusionsHigh FI was an independent risk factor for non-SSC in patients undergoing gastrectomy for GC. Our developed non-SSC risk model combining FI, BMI, and sex effectively identifies individuals at increased risk for non-SSC in GC patients.

Indexed as

FrailtyGastrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsStomach NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsComplicationElderlyFrailtyGastrectomyGastric cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.