Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875532›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

A phenotype-based AI pipeline outperforms human experts in differentially diagnosing rare diseases using EHRs.

Xiaohao Mao, Yu Huang, Ye Jin, Lun Wang, Xuanzhong Chen, Honghong Liu, Xinglin Yang, Haopeng Xu, Xiaodong Luan, Ying Xiao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. GEN-KnowRD: Reframing AI for Rare Disease Recognition.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. ChatGPT in precision medicine.APL bioengineering · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xiaohao Mao *Department of Computer Science and Technology & Institute for Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4636-4381
Yu Huang *Department of Computer Science and Technology & Institute for Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yuhuang.cst@gmail.com.
Ye Jin *Medical Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lun Wang *Department of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xuanzhong ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute for Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1214-6130
Honghong LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xinglin YangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Haopeng XuNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Xiaodong LuanState Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ying XiaoDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Siqin FengDepartment of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiahao ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute for Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xuegong ZhangDepartment of Automation & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9684-5643
Rui JiangDepartment of Automation & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shuyang ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. shuyangzhang103@nrdrs.org.
Ting ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Technology & Institute for Artificial Intelligence & BNRist, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. tingchen@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-9166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare diseases, affecting ~350 million people worldwide, pose significant challenges in clinical diagnosis due to the lack of experienced physicians and the complexity of differentiating between numerous rare diseases. To address these challenges, we introduce PhenoBrain, a fully automated artificial intelligence pipeline. PhenoBrain utilizes a BERT-based natural language processing model to extract phenotypes from clinical texts in EHRs and employs five new diagnostic models for differential diagnoses of rare diseases. The AI system was developed and evaluated on diverse, multi-country rare disease datasets, comprising 2271 cases with 431 rare diseases. In 1936 test cases, PhenoBrain achieved an average predicted top-3 recall of 0.513 and a top-10 recall of 0.654, surpassing 13 leading prediction methods. In a human-computer study with 75 cases, PhenoBrain exhibited exceptional performance with a top-3 recall of 0.613 and a top-10 recall of 0.813, surpassing the performance of 50 specialist physicians and large language models like ChatGPT and GPT-4. Combining PhenoBrain's predictions with specialists increased the top-3 recall to 0.768, demonstrating its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in clinical workflows.

Identifiers

PMID39875532
PMCPMC11775211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.