ArticleScientific reports2025
An optimal workflow scheduling in IoT-fog-cloud system for minimizing time and energy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic fog node placement optimization using adaptive dynamic pufferfish optimization for real-time IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cisplatin-mediated activation of NF-κB promotes lung cancer stem cell formation via DNA repair pathways.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing secure IoT data sharing through dynamic Q-learning and blockchain at the edge.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning and IoT-driven framework for real-time adaptive resource allocation and grid optimization in smart energy systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- S1PR3 inhibition impairs cell cycle checkpoint via the AKT/WEE1 pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Genomic structural equation modeling elucidates the shared genetic architecture of allergic disorders.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, with the increasing use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the world, various workflows that need to be stored and processed on the computing platforms. But this issue, causes an increase in costs for computing resources providers, and as a result, system Energy Consumption (EC) is also reduced. Therefore, this paper examines the workflow scheduling problem of IoT devices in the fog-cloud environment, where reducing the EC of the computing system and reducing the MakeSpan Time (MST) of workflows as main objectives, under the constraints of priority, deadline and reliability. Therefore, in order to achieve these objectives, the combination of Aquila and Salp Swarm Algorithms (ASSA) is used to select the best Virtual Machines (VMs) for the execution of workflows. So, in each iteration of ASSA execution, a number of VMs are selected by the ASSA. Then by using the Reducing MakeSpan Time (RMST) technique, the MST of the workflow on selected VMs is reduced, while maintaining reliability and deadline. Then, using VM merging and Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling (DVFS) technique on the output from RMST, the static and dynamic EC is reduced, respectively. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed method compared to previous methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.