Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875500›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Recurrent neural networks with transient trajectory explain working memory encoding mechanisms.

Chenghao Liu, Shuncheng Jia, Hongxing Liu, Xuanle Zhao, Chengyu T Li, Bo Xu, Tielin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenghao Liu *Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-7586
Shuncheng Jia *Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongxing Liu *Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuanle ZhaoInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chengyu T LiLingang Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Bo XuInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. xubo@ia.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-9891
Tielin ZhangInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhangtielin@ion.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-1529

Funding

Beijing Nova Program 20230484369Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) XDB1010302Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 2021SHZDZX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether working memory (WM) is encoded by persistent activity using attractors or by dynamic activity using transient trajectories has been debated for decades in both experimental and modeling studies, and a consensus has not been reached. Even though many recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have been proposed to simulate WM, most networks are designed to match respective experimental observations and show either transient or persistent activities. Those few which consider networks with both activity patterns have not attempted to directly compare their memory capabilities. In this study, we build transient-trajectory-based RNNs (TRNNs) and compare them to vanilla RNNs with more persistent activities. The TRNN incorporates biologically plausible modifications, including self-inhibition, sparse connection and hierarchical topology. Besides activity patterns resembling animal recordings and retained versatility to variable encoding time, TRNNs show better performance in delayed choice and spatial memory reinforcement learning tasks. Therefore, this study provides evidence supporting the transient activity theory to explain the WM mechanism from the model designing point of view.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsHumansRecurrent Neural Networks

Identifiers

PMID39875500
PMCPMC11775331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.