Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identifying factors that contribute to collision avoidance behaviours while walking in a natural environment.

Mohammadamin Nikmanesh, Michael E Cinelli, Daniel S Marigold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Visual Context Influences Lateral Balance While Walking on Winding Paths.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammadamin NikmaneshDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Michael E CinelliDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Daniel S MarigoldDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. daniel_marigold@sfu.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-04440Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-05894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Busy walking paths, like in a park, city centre, or shopping mall, frequently necessitate collision avoidance behaviour. Lab-based research has shown how different situation- and person-specific factors, typically studied independently, affect avoidance behaviour. What happens in the real world is unclear. Thus, we filmed unscripted pedestrian walking behaviours on a busy urban path. We leveraged deep learning algorithms to identify and extract pedestrian walking trajectories and had unbiased raters characterize situations where two pedestrians approached each other from opposite ends. We found that smaller medial-lateral distance between approaching pedestrians and smaller crowd size predicted an increased likelihood of a subsequent path deviation. Furthermore, we found that whether a pedestrian looked distracted or held, pushed, or pulled an object predicted medial-lateral distance between pedestrians at time of crossing. Our results highlight both similarities and differences with lab-based behaviour and offer insights relevant to developing accurate computational models for realistic pedestrian movement.

Indexed as

PedestriansWalkingAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39875496
PMCPMC11775279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.