Observational studyScientific reports2025
Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-stabilizing zero-profile 3D-printed vertebral body versus traditional titanium mesh-cage with plate in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: an open-label randomized controlled trial on efficacy and complications for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Trial
- Biomechanical advances in oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion using different interbody cages.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a Novel Flexible Cage System for C5-C6 Fixation: A Finite Element Study Against Conventional ACDF Implants.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Effectiveness comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile three-dimensional-printed interbody fusion Cage and titanium plate fusion Cage].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACDF) has become a classic surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseases, and various interbody cages are widely used in this procedure. We used 3D printing technology to produce a new type of plate-locking cage, anticipating to achieve high fusion rate with the high biomechanical stability. This study is to compare the biomechanical characteristics between a newly designed interbody cage and a conventional Zero-profile cage during ACDF using finite element analysis. The CT images of a 35-year-old healthy male were extracted and saved in DICOM format. Mimics Research 19.0, Geomagic Wrap 2017, NX12. 0, Abaqus 6.14 were used to construct the finite element models, then, titanium plate, titanium screw, cages, and the residual parts of both groups were assembled with reference to the surgical approach of ACDF (C4/5), following the successful establishment of both surgical models, a total of six boundary and loading conditions were tested, including flexion, extension, left and right bending, and left and right axial torsion. It is found that the plate stress peak of the new cage group decreased 73.78 MPa, 70.00%; 77.17 MPa, 70.67%; 59.77 MPa, 64.97%; 49.94 MPa, 58.28%; 44.55 MPa, 68.38%; 46.14 MPa, 68.00% in flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left axial torsion and right axial torsion, respectively. There were no obvious increases of C5 upper endoplate stress peak between these two surgical models (< 50%), except 11.68 MPa, 153.08%; 6.55 MPa, 51.45%; in flexion and extension. The 3D-printed porous plate-locking cage was shown to be biomechanically stable compared to the conventional Zero-profile cage, and it is worth noticing that the stress on the plate of the new cage is less than that on screw of the conventional cage, which indicates that the risk of fracture, loosening, and prolapse of the new cage is less likely to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.