ArticleScientific reports2025
Adapting a style based generative adversarial network to create images depicting cleft lip deformity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI image generation technology for visual communication design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and management of cleft lip and palate: An updated review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Training a machine learning system to evaluate any type of facial deformity is impeded by the scarcity of large datasets of high-quality, ethics board-approved patient images. We have built a deep learning-based cleft lip generator called CleftGAN designed to produce an almost unlimited number of high-fidelity facsimiles of cleft lip facial images with wide variation. A transfer learning protocol testing different versions of StyleGAN as the base model was undertaken. Data augmentation maneuvers permitted input of merely 514 frontal photographs of cleft-affected faces adapted to a base model of 70,000 normal faces. The Frechet Inception Distance was used to measure the similarity of the newly generated facial images to the cleft training dataset. Perceptual Path Length and the novel Divergence Index of Normality measures also assessed the performance of the novel image generator. CleftGAN generates vast numbers of unique faces depicting a wide range of cleft lip deformity with variation of ethnic background. Performance metrics demonstrated a high similarity of the generated images to our training dataset and a smooth, semantically valid interpolation of images through the transfer learning process. The distribution of normality for the training and generated images were highly comparable. CleftGAN is a novel instrument that generates an almost boundless number of realistic facial images depicting cleft lip. This tool promises to become a valuable resource for the development of machine learning models to objectively evaluate facial form and the outcomes of surgical reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.