Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875418›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Study of dissipation dynamics and persistent toxicity of selected insecticides in chilli using LCMSMS.

Sivasankari Sivakumar, Suganthi Angappan, Elaiyabharathi Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam Pagalahalli Sankaran, Renukadevi Perumal, Veeranan Arun Giridhari Veeranan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Kiruthika Kanagaraj, Mohammad Ikram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sivasankari SivakumarDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Suganthi AngappanDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India. suganthi.a@tnau.ac.in.
Elaiyabharathi ThiyagarajanDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Shanmugam Pagalahalli SankaranDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Renukadevi PerumalDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Veeranan Arun Giridhari VeerananCentre for Post Harvest Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
Bimal Kumar SahooDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Kiruthika KanagarajDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.
Mohammad IkramDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu State, Coimbatore, 641003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chilli, a globally cultivated and consumed crop is significantly impacted by Thrips parvispinus. The reliance on pesticides could result in residue contamination, adversely affecting quality, leading to export rejections and health risks to consumers. This study evaluated the bioefficacy and persistent toxicity of fipronil and tolfenpyrad against thrips in chilli, and persistence of their residues. Tolfenpyrad demonstrated higher field efficacy (60.94 to 78.53%) against thrips compared to fipronil (37.61 to 58.07%). Residue analysis was performed in leaves and green chilli fruits using LC-MS/MS. Fipronil's efficacy decreased after 5 to 7 days of application, but both fipronil and tolfenpyrad residues remained for 20 and 30 days, respectively. In contrast, the residues in leaves caused persistent toxicity to thrips, causing about 50% mortality until 10 to 15 days in tolfenpyrad treatment. In green chilli, residues of tolfenpyrad and fipronil persisted for up to 40 and 25 days, necessitating pre-harvest intervals of 3.17 and 19.39 to 30.65 days, respectively, but with no dietary risk to consumers. Tolfenpyrad exhibited superior efficacy against T. parvispinus compared to fipronil, with a longer duration of effectiveness in leaves and quicker residue dissipation in chilli fruits and a short pre-harvest interval, supporting its use in Integrated Pest Management.

Indexed as

CapsicumInsecticidesPesticide ResiduesThysanopteraAnimalsChromatography, LiquidFruitPlant LeavesPyrazolesTandem Mass SpectrometryfipronilInsecticidesPesticide ResiduesPyrazolesChilliFipronilPersistent toxicityResidueThripsTolfenpyrad

Identifiers

PMID39875418
PMCPMC11775314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.