ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Symptom-based depression subtypes: brain dynamic specificity and its association with gene expression profiles.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At least 227 combinations of symptoms meet the criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). However, in clinical practice, patients consistently present symptoms in a regular rather than random manner, and the neural basis underlying the MDD subtypes remains unclear. To help clarify the neural basis, patients with MDD were clustered by symptom combinations to investigate the neural underpinning of each subtype using functional resonance imaging (fMRI). Four symptom-based subtypes of MDD were identified using latent profile analysis according to the clinical scales. Subsequently, brain dynamics were evaluated using fMRI, and the dysregulations in attention and limbic network were observed among the subtypes. Correlation between brain dynamics and symptom combinations was then assessed via canonical correlation analysis (CCA). The brain-symptom correlation was higher when evaluated in subtypes (r = 0.77 to 0.92) compared to the entire group (r = 0.5). The loading weight in CCA showed that dynamics in transmodal networks contributed the most to the correlation in the subtypes characterized by typical depression symptoms, whereas unimodal networks contributed the most to subtypes characterized by anxiety and insomnia. Finally, gene expression underlying the CCA model, along with its biological encoding process, performed using a postmortem gene expression atlas revealed distinct gene enrichments for different subtypes. These findings highlight that distinct symptom clusters in MDD have specific neural correlates, providing insights into depression's heterogeneous diagnosis and precision medicine opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.