Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875392›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Dataset for developing deep learning models to assess crack width and self-healing progress in concrete.

Jacek Jakubowski, Kamil Tomczak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacek JakubowskiDepartment of Civil & Geotechnical Engineering and Geomechanics, AGH University of Krakow, al.Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Krakow, Poland. jakubjac@agh.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-4763
Kamil TomczakDepartment of Civil & Geotechnical Engineering and Geomechanics, AGH University of Krakow, al.Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-9833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presented dataset comes from an experimental study on the autogenous self-healing of high-strength concrete and the development of deep learning metasensor for crack width assessment and self-healing evaluation. Concrete specimens were prepared, matured, cracked, and exposed to self-healing. High-resolution scanning of the specimen surface and scale-invariant image processing were performed, multiple grid lines crossing cracks were established, and brightness degree profiles along grid lines were extracted. Then, reference measurements of the crack widths were obtained by an operator. The dataset comprises 19,098 records of brightness profiles, reference measurements, and benchmark measurements by deep learning and analytic models. The source images, stacked and marked with grid lines, are provided. The considerable number of brightness profiles coupled with manual reference measurements make the dataset well suited for developing an image-based deep CNN models or analytic algorithms for assessing crack widths in concrete. The technical validation study explored three factors that affect crack measurement: the specimen position in relation to the scanner, the surface moisture level, and the operator performing manual measurements.

Identifiers

PMID39875392
PMCPMC11775250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.