ArticleScientific data2025
Dataset for developing deep learning models to assess crack width and self-healing progress in concrete.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Calibrated Post-Processing Layer for Tolerance-Compliant Crack-Width Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of crack repair percentage in self-healing concrete using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dataset for developing deep learning models to assess crack width and self-healing progress in concrete.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presented dataset comes from an experimental study on the autogenous self-healing of high-strength concrete and the development of deep learning metasensor for crack width assessment and self-healing evaluation. Concrete specimens were prepared, matured, cracked, and exposed to self-healing. High-resolution scanning of the specimen surface and scale-invariant image processing were performed, multiple grid lines crossing cracks were established, and brightness degree profiles along grid lines were extracted. Then, reference measurements of the crack widths were obtained by an operator. The dataset comprises 19,098 records of brightness profiles, reference measurements, and benchmark measurements by deep learning and analytic models. The source images, stacked and marked with grid lines, are provided. The considerable number of brightness profiles coupled with manual reference measurements make the dataset well suited for developing an image-based deep CNN models or analytic algorithms for assessing crack widths in concrete. The technical validation study explored three factors that affect crack measurement: the specimen position in relation to the scanner, the surface moisture level, and the operator performing manual measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.