Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875301›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2025

Animal models of cocaine use: importance of social context and co-use.

Mia I Allen, Michael A Nader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mia I AllenDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1083, USA. Electronic address: miaallen@wakehealth.edu.
Michael A NaderDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1083, USA. Electronic address: mnader@wakehealth.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms Mediating Cocaine Abuse in Socially Housed Female and Male MonkeysR01DA017763 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael A Nader · 2004 to 2026
$9.8M
The effect of ethanol self-administration on cocaine reinforcement in male and female monkeysF31DA060614 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROUGH, MIA ISABEL · 2024 to 2025
$86k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA060614NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine-use disorders (CUDs) continue to be a major public health problem that requires effective treatments. Despite decades of preclinical research, there are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for cocaine use. While there are numerous potential reasons why no efficacious treatments have been identified or approved for cocaine use, we discuss two possible reasons in this review: the low number of studies incorporating social variables and the overlooking of the clinical reality of polysubstance use. These variables impact drug use across the substance-use cycle, including vulnerability, maintenance, and treatment. Recent preclinical and clinical data suggest that cocaine users who engage in polysubstance use should be viewed as a distinct and more prevalent population who require unique behavioral and pharmacological approaches to reduce cocaine use. Therefore, to understand the neurobiology and eventual treatments for CUDs, both variables should be included in animal models.

Indexed as

CocaineCocaine-Related DisordersDisease Models, AnimalSocial EnvironmentAnimalsHumansCocainealcoholcocainenicotinenonhuman primatespolysubstance use

Identifiers

PMID39875301
PMCPMC11890930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.