Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875235›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025

Evaluating pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2.

Jacob A Marsh, Guangming Huang, Kevin Bowling, Alan E Renton, Ellen Ziegemeier, Torri Ball, Cyril Pottier, Carlos Cruchaga, Gregory S Day, Randall J Bateman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. NovelWorld journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Genetic analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Benchmarking AlphaMissense pathogenicity predictions againstBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Correlations ofAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacob A MarshDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Guangming HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Kevin BowlingDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alan E RentonRonald M Loeb Center for Alzheimers Disease, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, and Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ellen ZiegemeierDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Torri BallDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Cyril PottierDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Carlos CruchagaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Gregory S DayDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Randall J BatemanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jorge J Llibre-GuerraDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Eric McDadeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Celeste M KarchDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA; Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: karchc@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) is driven by rare variants in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. Although more than 200 pathogenic variants in these genes are known to cause ADAD, other variants are benign, may act as risk factors, or may even reduce Alzheimer's disease risk (e.g. protective). Classifying novel variants in APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2 as pathogenic, risk, benign, or protective is a critical step in evaluating disease risk profiles which further impacts eligibility for clinical trials focused on the ADAD population. Here, we classify 53 novel variants in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 based on bioinformatic data and cell-based assays. We identified 6 benign variants, 2 risk variants, and 32 likely pathogenic variants. Thirteen variants were associated with reduced Aβ levels in cell-based assays, consistent with a potential protective effect. Together, this study highlights the complexities associated with classification of rare variants in ADAD genes.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorGenetic VariationPresenilin-1Presenilin-2HumansAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAPP protein, humanPresenilin-1Presenilin-2PSEN1 protein, humanPSEN2 protein, humanAutosomal dominant Alzheimer's diseaseCell-based assayPathogenicityVariants of unknown significance

Identifiers

PMID39875235
PMCPMC12047396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.