ArticleJournal of physical activity & health2025
Associations Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Mortality by Sociodemographic Factors.
Article in Journal of physical activity & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effects of Occupational and Leisure Time Physical Activity on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Repeated-Measures Longitudinal Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines 2nd Edition Advisory Committee Scientific Report recommended research to understand whether the health benefits of physical activity (PA) differed by sociodemographic factors. This study examined associations between meeting PA guidelines in leisure time and all-cause, heart disease, and cancer mortality across sociodemographic characteristics.
methodsNationally representative data on 567,483 eligible US adults from the 1998-2018 US National Health Interview Survey and 2019 public-use linked mortality files were used. Participants self-reported leisure-time aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA. Meeting PA guidelines was defined as meeting both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity recommendations. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing all-cause, heart disease, and cancer mortality risk across PA categories, with a focus on adults meeting guidelines.
resultsAcross sociodemographic groups, associations comparing mortality risk among adults meeting guidelines versus those meeting neither recommendation in leisure time ranged from no significant associations to significant risk reductions in mortality ranging from 14% to 36% for all-cause, 25% to 52% for heart disease, and 20% to 32% for cancer. Risk reductions were larger for women versus men (all cause and heart disease), non-Hispanic or non-Latino/a White adults compared with Hispanic or Latino/a adults (all cause), adults with college education or higher versus those with less than high school education (all cause), and adults with high school education versus those with some college education (cancer).
conclusionsMeeting PA guidelines provides a substantial reduction in mortality risk from all causes, heart disease, and cancer, but the magnitude of reduction may differ across sociodemographic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.