ArticleCancer genetics2025
In silico protein structural analysis of PRMT5 and RUVBL1 mutations arising in human cancers.
Article in Cancer genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulation of DNA repair gene expression by PRMT5.microPublication biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be generated spontaneously during DNA replication and are repaired primarily by Homologous Recombination (HR). However, efficient repair requires chromatin remodeling to allow the recombination machinery access to the break. TIP60 is a complex conserved from yeast to humans that is required for histone acetylation and modulation of HR activity at DSBs. Two enzymatic activities within the TIP60 complex, KAT5 (a histone acetyltransferase) and RUVBL1 (an AAA+ ATPase) are required for efficient HR repair. Post-translational modification of RUVBL1 by the PRMT5 methyltransferase activates the complex acetyltransferase activity and facilitates error free HR repair. In S. pombe a direct interaction between PRMT5 and the acetyltransferase subunit of the TIP60 complex (KAT5) was also identified. The TIP60 complex has been partially solved experimentally in both humans and S. cerevisiae, but not S. pombe. Here, we used in silico protein structure analysis to investigate structural conservation between S. pombe and human PRMT5 and RUVBL1. We found that there is more similarity in structure conservation between S. pombe and human proteins than between S. cerevisiae and human. Next, we queried the COSMIC database to analyze how mutations occurring in human cancers affect the structure and function of these proteins. Artificial intelligence algorithms that predict how likely mutations are to promote cellular transformation and immortalization show that RUVBL1 mutations should have a more drastic effect than PRMT5. Indeed, in silico protein structural analysis shows that PRMT5 mutations are less likely to destabilize enzyme function. Conversely, most RUVBL1 mutations occur in a region required for interaction with its partner (RUVBL2). These data suggests that cancer mutations could destabilize the TIP60 complex. Sequence conservation analysis between S. pombe and humans shows that the residues identified in cancer cells are highly conserved, suggesting that this may be an essential process in eukaryotic DSB repair. These results shed light on mechanisms of DSB repair and also highlight how S. pombe remains a great model system for analyzing DSB repair processes that are tractable in human cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.