ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Giant inguinal hernia with mal-rotation in a resource-limited area: Case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant inguinoscrotal hernias (GIH), defined as hernias extending below the inner thigh midpoint in a standing position, are rare and often seen in resource-limited settings due to delayed medical care. These hernias pose surgical challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where standardized management protocols are lacking, and risks such as cardiorespiratory compromise are significant. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old male presented with a large, irreducible right inguinoscrotal hernia of 1.5 years duration. Elective surgery involved sac separation and laparotomy, revealing herniation of bowel segments, including the terminal ileum and sigmoid colon, with concurrent intestinal malrotation. Ladd's procedure, appendectomy, and hernia repair were performed without complications. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with the patient remaining asymptomatic during follow-up. DISCUSSION: GIH management depends on hernia classification. While Type I hernias require simpler repairs, Types II and III often necessitate advanced techniques, such as Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum or bowel resection, to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Anatomical anomalies, such as malrotation, complicate surgical planning. Successful outcomes rely on individualized, resource-appropriate strategies and meticulous care, especially in LMICs.
conclusionGIH presents unique challenges, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Tailored approaches, informed by classification and patient-specific factors, are essential. This case underscores the importance of innovative strategies, careful planning, and standardized protocols to improve outcomes for GIH patients globally.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.