Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39874684›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2025

Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cord.

Sandrine Bédard, Enamundram Naga Karthik, Charidimos Tsagkas, Emanuele Pravatà, Cristina Granziera, Andrew Smith, Kenneth Arnold Weber Ii, Julien Cohen-Adad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: A vital component we can no longer overlook.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Early and Progressive Spinal Cord Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Charting Cervical Spinal Cord Morphometry Across the Lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandrine BédardNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: sandrine.bedard@polymtl.ca.
Enamundram Naga KarthikNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Mila - Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: naga-karthik.enamundram@polymtl.ca.
Charidimos TsagkasTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Emanuele PravatàNeuroradiology Department, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Cristina GranzieraTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrew SmithDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kenneth Arnold Weber IiDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Julien Cohen-AdadNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Mila - Québec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: jcohen@polymtl.ca.

Funding

Neuroimaging-Based Brain and Spinal Cord Biomarkers for Cervical RadiculopathyK23NS104211 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEBER, KENNETH ARNOLD · 2018 to 2022
$875k
Improving mechanistic understanding of responsiveness to spinal cord stimulation after spinal cord injuryK01HD106928 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SMITH, ANDREW CRAIG · 2022 to 2025
$508k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD106928NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS104211NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS108301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord segmentation is clinically relevant and is notably used to compute spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) for the diagnosis and monitoring of cord compression or neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis. While several semi and automatic methods exist, one key limitation remains: the segmentation depends on the MRI contrast, resulting in different CSA across contrasts. This is partly due to the varying appearance of the boundary between the spinal cord and the cerebrospinal fluid that depends on the sequence and acquisition parameters. This contrast-sensitive CSA adds variability in multi-center studies where protocols can vary, reducing the sensitivity to detect subtle atrophies. Moreover, existing methods enhance the CSA variability by training one model per contrast, while also producing binary masks that do not account for partial volume effects. In this work, we present a deep learning-based method that produces soft segmentations of the spinal cord that are stable across MRI contrasts. Using the Spine Generic Public Database of healthy participants (n=267; contrasts=6), we first generated participant-wise soft ground truth (GT) by averaging the binary segmentations across all 6 contrasts. These soft GT, along with aggressive data augmentation and a regression-based loss function, were then used to train a U-Net model for spinal cord segmentation. We evaluated our model against state-of-the-art methods and performed ablation studies involving different GT mask types, loss functions, contrast-specific models and domain generalization methods. Our results show that using the soft average segmentations along with a regression loss function reduces CSA variability (p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The proposed spinal cord segmentation model generalizes better than the state-of-the-art contrast-specific methods amongst unseen datasets, vendors, contrasts, and pathologies (compression, lesions), while accounting for partial volume effects. Our model is integrated into the Spinal Cord Toolbox (v6.2 and higher).

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal CordAlgorithmsHumansContrastsDeep learningMRIPartial volume effectSegmentationSoft labelsSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID39874684
PMCPMC13110827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.