Trial reportBlood advances2025
Efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult primary immune thrombocytopenia.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Open-label Controlled Trial Assessing Efficacy and Safety of DAPSone as a Second-line Option in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia
French Registry of Adult Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring exosome-related genes as candidate biomarkers in primary immune thrombocytopenia through transcriptomics and preliminary experimental validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comments and concerns on the analysis of DAPS-ITP trial.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractTo assess efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a real-world cohort study were performed. Participants were adults with primary ITP, transient response to corticosteroids with/without intravenous immunoglobulin, and a platelet count of ≤30 × 109/L (or ≤50 × 109/L with bleeding). Patients in the RCT were randomized in arm A (prednisone × 3 weeks + dapsone for 12 months) or arm B (prednisone alone). The observational study involved dapsone initiation at 100 mg/d with standard follow-up. The primary end point was the response rate (platelet count of >30 × 109/L and ≥2× baseline level) at 52 weeks, with the response rate at 24 weeks and adverse events as secondary end points. The RCT enrolled 93 patients (54.8% female), with median age of 48.5 years (46 years in arm A; and 47 years in arm B). In the intention-to-treat analysis, 78.3% of patients in arm A discontinued dapsone after a median of 4.6 weeks because of adverse events (66.7%) or lack of efficacy (33.3%). The response rate at week 52 was 21.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-36.4) in arm A vs 8.5% (95% CI, 2.7-18.6) in arm B (P = .17). The observational study, which was conducted after the end of the RCT, included 46 patients (52.2% female), median age of 50.7 years. Adverse events occurred in 30.4%, leading to discontinuation of dapsone in 23.9%, and 13.6% (95% CI 5.2-27.4) met the primary efficacy end point. Results from both studies showed an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio for the use of dapsone in adult primary ITP and suggest that, whenever available, second-line options should be used. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02627417 and #NCT02877706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.