ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
The fourth report of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) of the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery: focus on standardized outcome ratios.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multidimensional Profile of Quality of Life in Patients Living with Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Indication for durable mechanical circulatory support: an expert opinion review.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Closing the gap between trial and clinical reality in long-term left ventricular assist device use outcomes.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Patients on Ventricular Assist Device Support: Something to Worry About?Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Intragastric driveline transposition of a left ventricular assist device: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Observational
- From innovation to implementation: expanding global access to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Self and Dyadic Management of Patients and Care Partners Living with Durable Ventricular Assist Device: Emerging Science, Studies, and Frameworks to Advance Precision Health.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Impact of the United Network for Organ Sharing allocation criteria changes on temporary mechanical circulatory support use as a bridge to transplant.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Review
- To build a better VAD: What is needed to make MCS truly competitive with cardiac transplantation for long-term outcomes?JHLT open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis 4th report aimed to provide insights into patient characteristics, outcomes and standardized outcome ratios of patients implanted with durable Mechanical Circulatory Support across participating centres in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) registry.
methodsAll registered patients receiving durable mechanical circulatory support up to August 2024 were included. The expected number of events was predicted using penalized logistic regression. Standardized outcome ratios (Observed/Expected events) were presented in plots to assess 30-day and 1-year mortality, ischaemic stroke and major bleeding outcomes. Expected events were estimated using penalized logistic regression using demographics and comorbidities as predictors. Centres with <90% follow-up completeness were excluded from standardized outcome ratio assessment.
resultsAnalysis included 6962 implants in 6408 patients (457 patients underwent repeated implants) registered in EUROMACS from 17 countries (32 centres) (median age: 58 years, 83% males, 17% Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 1). Thirty-day mortality, major bleeding and ischaemic stroke probabilities were 9.6, 12.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Standardized mortality ratios showed variability between centres, ranging from 0 (95% CI 0-0) to 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.7). Higher standardized bleeding outcome ratios correlated with higher standardized ischaemic stroke ratio's (Spearman r: 0.56, P = 0.008).
conclusionsMost included centres perform as expected given the demographics and comorbidities of patients. A positive correlation was found between standardized bleeding and ischaemic stroke ratios, reflecting the need of continuously monitoring of adverse events by quality improvement programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.