Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39874358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparison of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and molybdenum blue colorimetry for total phosphorus determination in freshwater invertebrates.

Molly S Costanza-Robinson, Baker J Angstman, Qiting Cai, Charles Forbes, Julia S Keon, Shuyi Lin, Emma D Neill, Elizabeth G Peebles, Ella Roelofs, Eric K Moody

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Molly S Costanza-RobinsonProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-1315
Baker J AngstmanDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Qiting CaiProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Charles ForbesDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Julia S KeonProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Shuyi LinProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1483-460X
Emma D NeillProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Elizabeth G PeeblesProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-8814-5194
Ella RoelofsProgram for Environmental Studies, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.
Eric K MoodyDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molybdenum blue colorimetry (MBC) is the dominant, well-established method used for determining total P in environmental media, including in organismal tissues. However, other elemental methods for P determination are available, including inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Given the extensive literature using MBC to determine P in organismal samples, it is important to assess P analyses by ICP-MS and MBC to ensure that the two methods produce comparable data. In this work, we compared ICP-MS and MBC for total P determination in freshwater invertebrates, including the potential for analytical interferences, by applying both methods to three standard reference materials (SRMs) and 106 freshwater invertebrate samples. Average total P recoveries for SRMs were slightly higher for ICP-MS (99.8 ± 5.2%) than MBC (96.5 ± 5.4%), but both methods indicated good accuracy. Total P in invertebrates determined using the two methods was strongly linearly correlated (r = 0.96) with a slope of 1.01. On the whole, total P measured using ICP-MS exceeded that measured by MBC, but average pair-wise differences in %P were biologically negligible (0.044 ± 0.054). %P for SRMs and invertebrate samples run on ICP-MS in kinetic energy discrimination and standard modes compared favorably (e.g., SRM P recovery of 102% by both methods), indicating negligible influence of polyatomic ions on ICP-MS analysis. Similarly, analysis of P spike recoveries by ICP-MS (100.2 ± 3.4%) and MBC (107.0 ± 2.8%) were both considered acceptable. We conclude that ICP-MS represents a reliable and comparable alternative to MBC for determining total P in freshwater invertebrates while also offering the opportunity to measure additional biologically relevant elements in a single analysis.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsColorimetryInvertebratesMass SpectrometryPhosphorusAnimalsFresh WaterMolybdenumPlasma GasesReproducibility of ResultsMolybdenumPhosphorusPlasma Gases

Identifiers

PMID39874358
PMCPMC11774397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.