Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39874264›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Smart home technology to support engagement in everyday activities while ageing: A focus group study with current and future generations of older adults.

William Son Galanza, Jens Offerman, Sofi Fristedt, Susanne Iwarsson, Nebojsa Malesevic, Steven M Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William Son GalanzaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-2417
Jens OffermanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sofi FristedtFaculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Susanne IwarssonFaculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-7952
Nebojsa MalesevicFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Steven M SchmidtFaculty of Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the potential of smart home technologies (SHT) to support everyday activities, the implementation rate of such technology in the homes of older adults remains low. The overall aim of this study was to explore factors involved in the decision-making process in adopting SHT among current and future generations of older adults. We also aimed to identify and understand barriers and facilitators that can better support older adults' engagement in everyday activities. Focus group discussions were used to explore the perspectives of people from diverse age groups (30-39, 50-59, and 70-79-year-olds). Three focus groups met twice at a lab designed as a two-room home equipped with SHT. Our findings revealed that the participants' decision-making process for adopting SHT involved designs that must be adapted to the changing physical abilities and diverse needs of users. Some conditions, such as ideas for re-invention, were identified after the integration of SHT. Concerns about reliability, complicated interfaces, and value to the user influenced the decision to adopt SHT, highlighting the importance of these factors for successful implementation. Some participants did not fully understand what SHT is nor perceive its benefits, but they expressed a desire to acquire the skills and knowledge to operate SHT. Furthermore, participants desired SHT that can support an active lifestyle. The perceived advantages of SHT include enhancing the sense of security and safety, which can facilitate engagement in everyday activity. Some participants experienced a positive impact on quality of life, related to comfortable living with the implementation of SHT. Adults across age groups perceive that SHT can enhance engagement in everyday activity and the sense of safety and security. However, it is essential to identify solutions for better usability. More collaborative efforts involving diverse stakeholders are vital to bridge the disconnect between SHT design and users' needs and preferences.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgingAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39874264
PMCPMC11774344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.