Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39874252›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2025

Clinical derivation and data simulated validation of rule-out and rule-in algorithms for the Siemens Atellica IM high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay.

Ingar Ziad Restan, Ole-Thomas Steiro, John W Pickering, Hilde L Tjora, Jørund Langørgen, Torbjørn Omland, Paul Collinson, Rune Bjørneklett, Kjell Vikenes, Trude Steinsvik and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ingar Ziad RestanDepartment of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-7014
Ole-Thomas SteiroDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2520-9436
John W PickeringDepartment of Medicine, Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-0344
Hilde L TjoraEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-5497
Jørund LangørgenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-054X
Torbjørn OmlandDepartment of Cardiology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-0369
Paul CollinsonCardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's University of London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7000-5996
Rune BjørneklettEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-5743
Kjell VikenesDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-6269
Trude SteinsvikDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital, Bærum, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-4010
Øyvind SkadbergLaboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-2016
Øistein R MjelvaDepartment of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Alf Inge LarsenDepartment of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-0499
Vernon V S BonarjeeDepartment of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-0678
Kristin M AakreDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, P.O. Box 1400, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7340-6736

Funding

Western Norway Regional Health Authority 912265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis prospective, two-centre study derived and validated predictive algorithms for the Siemens Atellica IM high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay in the emergency department (ED). METHODS AND

resultsAlgorithms for predicting 30-day myocardial infarction (MI) Types 1 and 2 and death or non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI, Types 1 and 2) at index admission were developed from a derivation cohort of 1896 patients and validated using a synthetic data set with nearly 1 million patient cases. Performance was compared with the European Society of Cardiology algorithms for hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) and hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics). An admission hs-cTnI concentration < 5 ng/L had a negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity for 30-day MI or death of 99.5-99.7% and 98.1-98.8%, respectively, in the derivation cohort and validation data set. The NPV and sensitivity were ≥99.7% and ≥98.8% for ruling out index NSTEMI. A 0- to 1-h algorithm with baseline hs-cTnI concentration < 10 ng/L and Δ change < 3 ng/L had NPV of ≥99.5% and sensitivity ≥ 97.3% for predicting 30-day MI or death and a ≥99.5% sensitivity and NPV for index NSTEMI. Rule-in algorithms of either 0-h hs-cTnI ≥ 120 ng/L or 0- to 1-h Δ change ≥ 12 ng/L had positive predictive value ≥ 73% and specificity > 96% for 30-day MI or death and index NSTEMI. The results were comparable with established hs-cTn algorithms.

conclusionThis study presents Siemens Atellica hs-cTnI algorithms for diagnosis and risk prediction in the ED with performance comparable with established hs-cTnT (Roche) and hs-cTnI (Abbott) algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMyocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionTroponin IAgedBiomarkersEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkersTroponin IAcute coronary syndromeDeathHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponinMyocardial infarctionNon-ST-elevation myocardial infarctionNSTEMISiemens Atellica IM hs-cTnISimulated patientsSynthetic validation

Identifiers

PMID39874252
PMCPMC11929528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.