Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39874014›Full record

Observational studyAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

The Impact of Electronic and Conventional Cigarette Use towards Saliva Profile and Oral Microbiota in Adolescents.

Angelita Victoria Kurniawan, Rahmi Amtha, Indrayadi Gunardi, Alyah Heriandi, Elizabeth Fitriana Sari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tempeh Extract and HSC-3 Cell Migration: An In Vitro Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelita Victoria KurniawanDepartment of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rahmi AmthaDepartment of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0884-0325
Indrayadi GunardiDepartment of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0009-8955-4459
Alyah HeriandiDepartment of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Elizabeth Fitriana SariDepartment of Rural Clinical Science, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2171-8981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the salivary profiles of smokers (e-cigarette smokers, e-cigarette and former conventional cigarette smokers, dual users, and conventional cigarette smokers) and non-smokers in adolescents, focusing on acidity level, flow rate, viscosity, as well as the quantity of Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Candida albicans.

methodsThis analytical observational study, with a cross-sectional design, involves collecting saliva samples from five groups through the draining method. Saliva viscosity was assessed visually, while saliva flow rate was monitored over a ten-minute period. Quantification of bacterial presence was performed using qPCR, and salivary acidity was determined using a digital pH meter. Chi square and t-test were used to analyze the data.

resultThe total of 390 subjects (smokers n=195; non-smokers n=195), aged 17-25 years, participated in the study. Dual smokers exhibited a notable decrease in salivary pH (p=0.039) compared to non-smokers. Furthermore, significant reductions in flow rate (p<0.001) were observed across the five groups, however, no significant differences were found in saliva viscosity (p=0.070). When considering the four groups excluding conventional cigarette smokers, significant differences were observed in the quantity of Porphyromonas gingivalis (p=0.010) and Candida albicans (p=0.005). Conversely, the prevalence of Streptococcus mutans did not exhibit a significant difference (p=0.635).

conclusionThe study demonstrates that salivary pH, flow rate, and quantity of P. gingivalis as well as C. albicans are significantly different among the five groups.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsMicrobiotaMouthSalivaSmokingAdolescentAdultCandida albicansCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePorphyromonas gingivalisPrognosisC. albicanscigaretteP. gingivalisSalivary profileS.mutans

Identifiers

PMID39874014
PMCPMC12082429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.