ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Finite element modeling of clavicle fracture fixations: a systematic scoping review.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel concept for splint fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: a biomechanical feasibility study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Is there a difference in plate positioning for clavicle shaft fractures? A retrospective cohort study of 355 cases.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- 320 mm InterTan nail optimizes biomechanics in AO/OTA 31A2.3 fractures: superior stress distribution, micromotion, and strain for enhanced healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finite element analysis has become indispensable for biomechanical research on clavicle fractures. This review summarized evidence regarding configurations and applications of finite element analysis in clavicle fracture fixation. Seventeen articles involving 22 clavicles were synthesized from CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Most studies investigated midshaft transverse closed fractures by reconstructing intact models from CT scans and simulating fractures through gap creation. Common loading schemes included axial compression, distal torsion, and inferior bending. The primary objective was comparing different implant designs/placements on construct stiffness, von Mises stress, and fracture site micro-motion. Our review suggested a preference for plate fixation, particularly with anterior placement, for midshaft transverse fractures. However, limited fracture types studied constrain comprehensive recommendations. Additionally, the review highlighted discrepancies between finite element and clinical studies, emphasizing the need for improved modeling of physiological conditions. Future research should focus on developing a comprehensive database of finite element models to test various implant options and placements under common loading schemes, bridging the gap between biomechanical simulations and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.