ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Report on Evolving Indications, Technique, and Outcomes of Novel And Surgical Procedures-NUsurface.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meniscal tissue engineering: Bridging clinical needs and experimental innovation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- [Applications and challenges of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers in minimally invasive medical devices].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Corrigendum to "Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration" [Mater. Today Bio 35 (2025) 102571].Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Artificial medial and lateral meniscus prostheses mimic kinematics of the native meniscus without affecting knee joint motion: A cadaveric study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMeniscectomy alters knee function and known to be associated with an increased incidence of knee arthritis. Several methods and materials have been tried to replicate the function of a meniscus. One is a polycarbonate-urethane synthetic medial meniscus implant labeled as NUsurface. It is a non-anchored implant that is meant to replace the native meniscus. This article is intended to give an overview of the NUsurface implant and the experience to date. RECENT
findingsThe NUsurface implant is not intended to be a substitute for arthroplasty but has indications similar to meniscal allografts. It has had both prospective double armed and single armed prospective studies. Follow up at the 2-year mark has shown the implant can be successful in decreasing patients' pain and improving function. However, the reoperation rate has been high with a little over a 1/3 requiring an additional procedure and 30% requiring implant exchanged. With improved surgical technique and knowledge of contributing anatomic variables, the reoperation rate has been decreased by half. The synthetic medial meniscus implant NUsurface is able to improve the quality of life in select patients that are symptomatic after meniscectomy. The reoperation rate is of concern but it is decreasing as we refine the variables contributing to the high rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.