ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2025
Utility of a
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Data mining-based analysis to explore the application of an animal model of diabetic gastroparesis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe carbon-13 spirulina gastric emptying breath test (GEBT) is approved to identify delayed, but not accelerated, gastric emptying (GE). We compared the utility of the GEBT to scintigraphy for diagnosing abnormal GE in patients with diabetes mellitus.
methodsTwenty-eight patients with diabetes ate a 230-kcal test meal labeled with technetium 99 m and KEY
resultsScintigraphy revealed normal, delayed, and accelerated GE, respectively, in 17 (30%), 29 (52%), and 10 (18%) test results. GE T½ values measured with scintigraphy and GEBT were highly concordant within individuals; the intraindividual reproducibility was 34% (scintigraphy) and 15% (GEBT). Compared to current criteria, the kPCD150 (150 min) and kPCD180 values provided equally sensitive (90%) and more specific (81% vs. 67%) approach for distinguishing between delayed versus normal/accelerated GE. A new metric (kPCD60-kPCD15 min) was 90% sensitive and 83% specific for distinguishing between accelerated versus normal/delayed GE. These findings were used to create nomograms and an algorithm for interpreting GEBT results. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Among patients with poorly controlled diabetes, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.