Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39873944›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Impact of comorbidity on survival in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Merih Yalçıner, Satı Coşkun Yazgan, Eda Eylemer Mocan, Beliz Bahar Karaoğlan, Hatice Bölek, Emre Yekedüz, Yüksel Ürün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of enteral nutrition in cancer patients - methodological adjustments and recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merih YalçınerMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey. merihyalciner@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-2188
Satı Coşkun YazganMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2979-9974
Eda Eylemer MocanMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-8142
Beliz Bahar KaraoğlanMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-7588
Hatice BölekMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8659-7327
Emre YekedüzMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-5930
Yüksel ÜrünMedical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Ankara University, Dikimevi, 06590, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9152-9887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmunotherapy efficacy in elderly patients with comorbidities and poor performance status is not well understood. More knowledge on this topic is needed to identify subgroups that will benefit from immunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of comorbidity burden in patients receiving immunotherapy. METHODS/PATIENTS: Patients older than 18 years of age and diagnosed with various malignancies, followed up in our tertiary cancer center were screened. Patients treated with immunotherapy were included in this study. We used to Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to evaluate patients' comorbidity burden. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval (CI) was evaluated in multivariable analysis.

resultsA total number of 197 patients were included. The median age was 62 years. Patients were grouped based on CCI scores: CCI-low (≤ 8) and CCI-high (> 8). One-hundred and seven patients (54.9%) had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Most frequently used immunotherapy agent was nivolumab (n = 124, 62.9%), followed by pembrolizumab (n = 36, 18.3%). The median OS was shorter in the CCI-high group than in the CCI-low group (10.6 vs. 21.2 months, p = 0.002) In multivariable analysis, treatment with anti-CTLA4 (HR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.07-3.20, p = 0.028), ECOG performance status (2-4 vs. 0-1) (HR: 2.17; 95% CI 1.25-3.75; p = 0.005), and higher CCI scores (CCI-high vs. CCI-low) (HR: 1.97; 95% CI 1.3-3.0; p = 0.001) were independently associated with worse OS.

conclusionsComorbidity burden and performance status independently predict survival outcomes in immunotherapy-treated cancer patients. Comprehensive comorbidity assessment is essential for optimizing treatment and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsComorbidityImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39873944
PMCPMC12179231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.