ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
Brief Scoping Review of Pathways Community Hubs for the Care of Pregnant Mothers and Their Infants.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPathways Community Hub (PCH) programs help connect pregnant women to healthcare and social services. A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies on PCHs that reported quantitative outcomes was conducted.
methodsA search of academic databases from 1901 to 2024 initially yielded a total of 1,312 articles, which was ultimately reduced to 4 articles after duplicates were removed, and two levels of screening were conducted to determine whether studies met the inclusion criteria of evaluating a community hub for pregnant women, was written in English, was peer-reviewed, and reported quantitative outcomes.
resultsThe four studies in the scoping review included data collected from 2014 to 2020 in Ohio, Arizona, and Kansas. Sample sizes of participants in PCHs ranged from 112 to 7,212. In all four studies, the majority of participants was mothers from racial/ethnic minority groups. All four studies had a comparison group, and three of the four used propensity score matching. Three studies focused on infants' low birth weight (LBW) as an outcome and found PCHs were associated with reduced rates of LBW. The fourth study reported that PCHs were associated with a greater likelihood of receipt of adequate prenatal care among participating women.
conclusionsWhile these studies provide some preliminary evidence of the benefits of PCHs, no randomized trial could be found. More rigorous, multi-site studies are needed to move PCHs up the evidence hierarchy as an effective model of care for pregnant women and their babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39873937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.