ArticleGeroScience2025
The negative relationship between brain-age gap and psychological resilience defines the age-related neurocognitive status in older people.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The moderating role of psychological resilience on brain aging and PTSD in a community sample of South African women.Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Taurine and glutamine supplementation in aging: systemic mechanisms, exercise interactions, and modulation of muscular and neurobiological pathways.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Potential vulnerability and resilience to accelerated brain aging in women exposed to stressful life events: insights from the brain age prediction model.Neurobiology of stress · 2025Article
- Association between shift work and brain age gap: a neuroimaging study using MRI-based brain age prediction algorithms.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological brain age is a brain-predicted age using machine learning to indicate brain health and its associated conditions. The presence of an older predicted brain age relative to the actual chronological age is indicative of accelerated aging processes. Consequently, the disparity between the brain's chronological age and its predicted age (brain-age gap) and the factors influencing this disparity provide critical insights into cerebral health dynamics during aging. In this study, we employed a Lasso regression model and analyzed multimodal imaging data from 124 participants aged 53 to 76 to formulate and predict brain age. Additionally, we conducted partial correlation analyses to explore the complex relationship between the brain-age gap and network metrics, cognitive assessments, and emotional evaluations, while controlling for chronological age, gender, and education. Our findings highlight psychological resilience as a significant mitigating factor against premature brain aging. It is established that psychological resilience significantly influences the modulation of the brain-age gap. Moreover, psychological resilience and the brain-age gap exhibit a high accuracy (above 0.72) in segregating Montreal Cognitive Assessment score-based cohorts. This observation underscores significant insight into the potential of utilizing the brain-age gap as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of accelerated aging. It advocates for the timely application of interventions, including the development of programs aimed at bolstering psychological resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.