Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39873867›Full record

ArticleBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025

An Automated Tool for Glycosimilarity Assessment of mAb Therapeutic Biosimilars: Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab as Case Studies.

Anuj Shrivastava, Sanjeet S Patil, Rohan Shah, Anurag S Rathore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anuj ShrivastavaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Sanjeet S PatilDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Rohan ShahDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Anurag S RathoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India. asrathore@biotechcmz.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5913-4244

Funding

Agilent Technologies Agilent Thought Leader Award 2020Tata Sons Tata Transformation Prize 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the expiration of patents for multiple biotherapeutics, biosimilars are gaining traction globally as cost-effective alternatives to the original products. Glycosylation, a critical quality attribute, makes glycosimilarity assessment pivotal for biosimilar development. Given the complexity of glycoanalytical profiles, assessing glycosimilarity is nontrivial.

objectiveThis study proposes a Python-based automated tool for rapid estimation of glycosimilarity index (GI). MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive analytical glycosimilarity comparison of the trastuzumab originator product, Herclon (Roche), with five marketed biosimilars:Trasturel (Reliance Life Sciences), Canmab (Biocon), Vivitra (Zydus Ingenia), Hertraz (Mylan), and Biceltis (Cipla), has been performed. Similarly, a comparison between the bevacizumab originator product, Avastin (Roche), and its five biosimilars: Abevmy (Mylan), Krabeva (Biocon), Ivzumab (RPG LifeSciences), Bryxta (Zydus), and Advamab (Alkem Labs), is presented. Glycan profile  has been assessed using liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection, and the  data have been integrated using the XGBoost-machine learning algorithm to quantify glycan composition. The GI has been calculated by combining profile similarity and compositional similarity, estimated on the basis of the criticality and tolerance of each glycan.

resultsThe tool enabled rapid GI estimation (< 1 min/sample) with reduced errors compared with Excel (> 10 min/sample). Biosimilars exhibited high GI with several exceeding 95%, while the lowest GI observed were 87.80% for trastuzumab and 92.39% for bevacizumab.

conclusionsThe Python-based tool offers a high-throughput and a reliable platform for glycosimilarity assessment, outperforming traditional analysis. Minor variations in glycosylation patterns were observed among the biosimilars, suggesting a modest glycosimilarity variation (GI range between 80 and 100%). However, the limited number of innovator batches analyzed constrained the establishment of definitive tolerance limits. Future studies should focus on analyzing larger datasets to improve accuracy and define precise tolerance limits, enhancing the tool's reliability and its potential to accelerate biosimilar development.

Indexed as

BevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsTrastuzumabGlycosylationHumansBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsTrastuzumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.