SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Unveiling pterion variability: a meta-analytic approach to enhance neurosurgical precision.
Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjunct Surgical Middle Meningeal Artery Obliteration for Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Case Series and Technical Note.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2026Article
- Morphometric analyses of neurovascular triangles in pterional craniotomy: a cadaveric study in Eastern India.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Surgical anatomy of the pterion and its relationship to the middle meningeal artery in optimizing pterional craniotomies: a cadaveric perspective.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- The Anatomy of the Stylohyoid Chain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis meta-analytical systematic review aims at investigating the variability of the pterion, focusing on its morphological types and precise distances from various bony landmarks. Additionally, the neurosurgical significance of this critical cranial landmark is examined in depth.
methodsThe systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and Evidence-based Anatomy Workgroup guidelines for anatomical studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assurance Tool (AQUA). The meta-analysis was performed using R programming software and RStudio, employing the "meta" and "metafor" packages.
resultsA total of 79 studies were included, encompassing 18,694 skull sides. The sphenoparietal type was identified as the most prevalent pterion variant, with a pooled prevalence of 78.54%. The epipteric type followed at 8.41%, while the frontotemporal (5.74%) and stellate (4.26%) types were the rarest. Significant differences in the prevalence of the epipteric, frontotemporal, and stellate types were observed across different nationalities. However, sex, side, and study type did not significantly influence pterion morphological variation. The study also extracted and calculated the distances between the pterion and key anatomical landmarks, including the midpoint of the zygomatic arch, the frontozygomatic suture, the mastoid process, and the external acoustic meatus.
conclusionThis study offers critical anatomical insights by accurately mapping the pterion's location relative to essential cranial landmarks. These findings are vital for neurosurgical planning, particularly for procedures involving the anterior and middle cranial fossae. The detailed anatomical data provided can enhance the precision and safety of neurosurgical interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.