ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Identifying care gaps and referral patterns in acute dermatology at urgent care centers.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited urgent access to board-certified dermatologists drives patients to seek dermatologic care at urgent care centers (UCC). UCC are staffed by clinicians with comparatively limited dermatology training, often resulting in lower quality care for acute dermatology conditions. Using a retrospective cohort of 839 referrals, this study investigates health care referral outcomes for patients seeking dermatologic care at UCC. We further surveyed five dermatologists on the appropriateness of UCC referral and UCC treatment plans in a subset of 40 referrals, as well as the feasibility of referral management by dermatology e-consultation (eConsult). Most patients referred by UCC did not complete an in-person dermatology evaluation (56.5%). Of those that completed an in-person dermatology evaluation, only 29.1% of UCC diagnoses were concordant. While our surveyed dermatologists (≥3/5 consensus) determined only 20% of UCC referrals had appropriate treatment plans, they found most referrals (92.5%) could have been managed with an eConsult with only 5.0% requiring an urgent in-person dermatology evaluation. These data reveal several practice gaps in dermatological care delivery in UCC and inefficiencies in the urgent referral process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39873784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.