Observational studyHeart and vessels2025
Impact of lactate levels on admission in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock treated with IMPELLA.
Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simple risk stratification of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: based on the modified DanGer shock trial-derived criteria assessed at initial emergency room presentation.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Studies of Lactate in Heart Failure: From Metabolic Biomarker to Therapeutic Target.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concomitant use of IMPELLA and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) (ECPELLA) has been increasingly used to treat severe cardiogenic shock. However, the relationship between severity of heart failure on admission and prognosis based on differences in the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is not fully understood. This study evaluated the association between lactate levels on admission and clinical outcomes based on differences in MCS. We identified 852 patients (median age 71 years; 78% male) with cardiogenic shock due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices. The primary endpoint was the in-hospital mortality rate. Additionally, patients were classified into three groups based on lactate levels according to the SCAI SHOCK classification for the assessment of in-hospital mortality: group 1 (lactate level < 2 mmol/L), group 2 (lactate level 2-8 mmol/L), and group 3 (lactate level ≥ 8 mmol/L). The in-hospital mortality rate was 41.8%. The rate of V-A ECMO combined with IMPELLA use was 37.6%. The in-hospital mortality rates of the IMPELLA alone and ECPELLA group were 30.1% and 61.3%, respectively. The median lactate level was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (5.7 mmol/L vs. 3.5 mmol/L, p < 0.0001). The in-hospital mortality rate with IMPELLA alone was significantly higher in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2; however, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality with ECPELLA among the three groups. A lactate cut-off value of 6.9 mmol/L showed the best discrimination for in-hospital mortality. Patients classified as the SCAI SHOCK stage E have a higher mortality rate with IMPELLA support alone. Further research is needed to optimize management strategies for this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39873763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.