Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39873757›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025

Inoculum selection and hydraulic retention time impacts in a microbial fuel cell treating saline wastewater.

Antonio Castellano-Hinojosa, Manuel J Gallardo-Altamirano, Clementina Pozo, Alejandro González-Martínez, Jesús González-López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio Castellano-HinojosaEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, 18003, Granada, Spain. ach@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-7625
Manuel J Gallardo-AltamiranoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, 18003, Granada, Spain.
Clementina PozoEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, 18003, Granada, Spain.
Alejandro González-MartínezEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, 18003, Granada, Spain.
Jesús González-LópezEnvironmental Microbiology Group, Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, 18003, Granada, Spain.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101108081Ministry of University, Research and Innovation of the Junta de Andalucía and by FEDER, A way of Making Europe P20-00079Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID-2020-112550RB-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology has received increased interest as a suitable approach for treating wastewater while producing electricity. However, there remains a lack of studies investigating the impact of inoculum type and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the efficiency of MFCs in treating industrial saline wastewater. The effect of three different inocula (activated sludge from a fish-canning industry and two domestic wastewater treatment plants, WWTPs) on electrochemical and physicochemical parameters and the anodic microbiome of a two-chambered continuous-flow MFC was studied. For each inoculum, three different HRTs were tested (1 day, 3 days, and 6 days). The inoculum from the fish canning industry significantly increased voltage production (with a maximum value of 802 mV), power density (with a maximum value of 78 mW m

Indexed as

BacteriaBioelectric Energy SourcesWastewaterWater PurificationElectricityElectrodesMicrobiotaSalinitySewageTime FactorsSewageWastewaterElectroactive microorganismsMFCSalinityVoltage productionWastewater

Identifiers

PMID39873757
PMCPMC11774983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.