Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39873744›Full record

Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Time trend analysis of osteoporosis prevalence among adults 50 years of age and older in the USA, 2005-2018.

Chris M Naso, Shuo-Yu Lin, Ge Song, Hong Xue

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Multi-center validation of automated CT-based L1 vertebral Hounsfield unit.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends and disparities in DXA testing for osteoporosis among Medicare beneficiaries, 2005-2023.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Calcium isotope ratio (δOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. OsteoStrong and bone health: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chris M NasoDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Shuo-Yu LinDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Ge SongDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Hong XueDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr, Fairfax, VA, USA. hxue4@gmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-6396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from NHANES for years 2005-2018, we examined temporal trends in osteoporosis prevalence and the proportion of undiagnosed osteoporosis in the United States of America. Our results suggested statistically significant increases in osteoporosis prevalence across several demographic groups. These findings carry profound implications for public health, given increased life expectancy and burden of chronic diseases.

introductionThis is the first study to assess osteoporosis prevalence trends over time and the proportion of undiagnosed osteoporosis across gender, ethnicity/race, and age groups.

methodsObservational time trend analyses were conducted using the 2005-2006, 2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) datasets, along with a descriptive analysis using the 2017-2018 NHANES dataset to capture the proportion of undiagnosed osteoporosis.

resultsThe findings showed a statistically significant increase in osteoporosis prevalence among women, non-Hispanic Whites, and all age groups (except for individuals 80 years of age and older) during the study period. A subsequent analysis examining individuals by both gender and ethnicity/race demonstrated a statistically significant increase among Other Hispanic men and non-Hispanic White women. Additional descriptive analyses found that 69.12% of individuals with osteoporosis went undiagnosed. Specifically, 86.88% of men and 84.77% of individuals 50-59 years of age with osteoporosis went undiagnosed, representing the two highest groups. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe substantial and increasing prevalence among certain groups and sub-groups, along with the lack of diagnostic capture of osteoporosis, highlights existing gaps in public health efforts and care delivery infrastructure. This paper highlights high-risk groups and sub-groups that may benefit most from accelerated initiatives to reduce the burden of illness associated with osteoporosis.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPattern Analysis, MachinePrevalenceSex DistributionUnited StatesEpidemiologyOsteoporosisPrevalencePublic healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39873744
PMCPMC11882656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.