Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39873738›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025

[HEW score-a tool for the homogenisation of donor registrations to the DSO : Multicentre retrospective analysis of three university hospitals].

Felix Lehmann, Stefan F Ehrentraut, Jan Görtzen-Patin, Martin Söhle, Juliane Langer, Mohammed Banat, Daniel Schrader, Holger Kraus, Johannes Weller

Abstract readMulticenter StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Potential for donation after circulatory death in Germany: a multicenter retrospective study at seven university hospitals.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felix LehmannKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. felix.lehmann@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-9271
Stefan F EhrentrautKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Jan Görtzen-PatinKlinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Martin SöhleKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Juliane LangerTransplantationsbeauftragte, Stabsstelle Ärztliche Direktion, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Mohammed BanatKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
Daniel SchraderStabsstelle Organspendekoordination, Universitätsklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Holger KrausTransplantationsbeauftragter, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Johannes WellerKlinik für vaskuläre Neurologie und Klinik für Neuroonkologie, Zentrum für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe persistently low number of postmortem organ donations in Germany has repeatedly led to political discussions and most recently to the amendment of the Transplantation Act with the strengthening of the role of the transplantation officer and the introduction of a register to document the will to donate. The background to these decisions was the assumption that a relevant proportion of potential organ donors in hospitals were being overlooked and not reported. However, due to the lack of guidelines as to when a potential organ donor must be reported to the DSO ("Deutsche Stiftung Organspende"), the existing data is only of limited validity.

objectivesThe transplantation officers of the university hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) therefore agreed on the HEW score (brain function loss-suitability-will) presented here as a shared standard for reporting potential organ donors. MATERIALS AND

methodsAssigning the scores from 1 to 3 to each of the three included attributes results in a score of 111 to 333, and reporting to the DSO is recommended if the threshold value of 213 is exceeded. For implementation, the HEW scores of the cases determined by TransplantCheck from the university hospitals in Bonn, Essen and Düsseldorf from 2022 were collected retrospectively and presented in this paper.

resultsOverall, the number of cases to be reported according to the HEW score was 13.5% below the number of cases actually reported at all three sites (126 vs. 109). In all three centres, the refusal rate was high at 54.5-64.9%.

conclusionThe HEW score represents a tool for the detailed recording and standardised reporting of potential organ donors and can enable homogenised reporting behaviour as a data basis for future improvement approaches.

Indexed as

Brain DeathHospitals, UniversityRegistriesTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesBrain deathDonor identificationIrreversible loss of brain functionNeurointensive careOrgandonation

Identifiers

PMID39873738
PMCPMC12594715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.