SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Evaluating the efficacy of nano-cyclosporine A in mice model of ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclosporine A is an immunosuppressive drug used in clinics to treat steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, due to its side effects, researchers are evaluating novel drug delivery-based treatment options. Nanoparticles-based cyclosporine (Nano-CSA) offers a promising option for the treatment of UC, and various in vivo studies on animals have been conducted. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effects of using Nano-CSA based formulations in the mouse UC model. A systemic literature search was conducted on five different electronic databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, PMC, and Cochrane) to search studies conducted between the timeline of 2016 and 2024. The search terms include "nanoparticles," "ulcerative colitis," and "cyclosporine A." The primary outcomes include histological scores and colon length. The Nano-CSA effects on UC were assessed by analyzing the difference between the treatment and untreated control groups, through the use of standardized mean difference (SMD). A fixed effect model was used where heterogeneity was less than 50%, for higher heterogeneity random effect model was used. The total number of included studies for this systematic review was six, from which meta-analysis was performed on four studies. In all the studies, dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) was used to induce UC, except for one study that used TNBS (2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid) for UC induction. Four studies measured histological score and colon length, and two studies measured other secondary outcomes (IL-6, TNF-α, and MPO (myeloperoxidase activity)). Meta-analysis results have demonstrated that there is an increase in colon length with SMD of 6.879 and a decrease in histological score with SMD of 10.956 in the Nano-CSA treated group. There was also a decrease in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-6 in the Nano-CSA treated group and no significant difference in MPO activity of the two groups. Colon length, MPO activity, and TNF-α expression demonstrated heterogeneity values of 84.638, 86.113, and 51.567 respectively. The results of this meta-analysis have demonstrated the potential therapeutic efficiency of Nano-CSA for the treatment of UC in mice models. Further research is required in order to explore nano-based novel therapeutics options for UC treatment in other models as well as with human applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39873716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.