Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025
Comparison of different treatment positions of nerve slider technique for patients with low back pain: a randomized control trial.
Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07384832 (Comparative Effectiveness of Dynamic Stretching Versus Slider Neurodynamic Technique In Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Dynamic Stretching Versus Slider Neurodynamic Technique In Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy : a Randomised Controlled Trail
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Tissue Flossing and Neural Mobilization Techniques in Adolescent Basketball Athletes: Randomized, Cross-Over, Controlled Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of Biopsychosocial Model-Based Care versus Routine Physical Therapy on Clinical, Sensorimotor, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow back pain (LBP) accompanied by sciatica is a widespread musculoskeletal issue with multifactorial etiology, impacting individuals across various demographics. Conservative treatments, notably physiotherapy, are key in managing LBP with sciatica, with neural mobilization techniques emerging as beneficial adjuncts.
aimThis research aims to assess the effectiveness of utilizing the sciatic slider technique (SST) in both supine and slump positions, compared to conventional physiotherapy alone, in alleviating pain severity, improving lumbar flexibility, lumbar lordosis, lower limb muscle strength, and functional ability in patients with LBP associated with sciatica.
designrandomized controlled trial.
settingDepartment of Physiotherapy at Alia Hospital. POPULATION: Sixty participants with LBP associated with sciatica.
methodsThe participants were randomly allocated into three groups: Group (A) N.=20 received the SST in a slump position alongside conventional physiotherapy, Group (B) N.=20 received the same technique in a supine position with conventional physiotherapy, and Group (C) or (control) N.=20 underwent only conventional physiotherapy. Each group underwent three sessions per week for four weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale), functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index), lumbar flexibility (Modified Schober test), lower limb muscle strength (Hand-held dynamometry), and lumbar lordosis (Flexible ruler).
resultsAnalysis revealed significant differences between treatment groups. The slump position exhibited superior effectiveness in reducing pain intensity (P<0.001), and improving disability (P<0.001), with greater improvements in pain scores and disability index percentages. Additionally, slump position therapy led to significantly greater enhancements in range of motion (P<0.001), and hip abductor (P=0.007) when compared to the supine position. However, both techniques showed similar effects on lumbar lordosis angle and various lower limb muscle strength.
conclusionsThe sciatic nerve slider technique, whether applied in the slump or supine position, demonstrated superior outcomes compared to conventional physiotherapy alone in managing LBP with sciatica. Nevertheless, the slump position showed greater efficacy in reducing pain, improving disability, and enhancing certain functional parameters. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: These findings advocate for the inclusion of neural mobilization techniques, particularly in the slump position, in the management of LBP with sciatica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.