ArticleJournal of vision2025
Modality-, feature-, and strategy-dependent organization of low-level working memory.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has shown that, when multiple similar items are maintained in working memory, recall precision declines. Less is known about how heterogeneous sets of items across different features within and between modalities impact recall precision. In two experiments, we investigated modality (Experiment 1, n = 79) and feature-specific (Experiment 2, n = 154) load effects on working memory performance. First, we found a cross-modal advantage in continuous recall: Orientations that are memorized together with a pitch are recalled more precisely than orientations that are memorized together with another orientation. The results of our second experiment, however, suggest that this is not a pure effect of sensory modality but rather a feature-dependent effect. We combined orientations, pitches, and colors in pairs. We found that memorizing orientations together with a color benefits orientation recall to a similar extent as the cross-modal benefit. To investigate this absence of interference between orientations and colors held in working memory, we analyzed subjective reports of strategies used for the different features. We found that, although orientations and pitches rely almost exclusively on sensory strategies, colors are memorized not only visually but also with abstract and verbal strategies. Thus, although color stimuli are also visually presented, they might be represented by independent neural circuits. Our results suggest that working memory storage is organized in a modality-, feature-, and strategy-dependent way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.