ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Improving the generalization of protein expression models with mechanistic sequence information.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of regulatory DNA with active learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for biological products drives many efforts to maximize expression of heterologous proteins. Advances in high-throughput sequencing can produce data suitable for building sequence-to-expression models with machine learning. The most accurate models have been trained on one-hot encodings, a mechanism-agnostic representation of nucleotide sequences. Moreover, studies have consistently shown that training on mechanistic sequence features leads to much poorer predictions, even with features that are known to correlate with expression, such as DNA sequence motifs, codon usage, or properties of mRNA secondary structures. However, despite their excellent local accuracy, current sequence-to-expression models can fail to generalize predictions far away from the training data. Through a comparative study across datasets in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, here we show that mechanistic sequence features can provide gains on model generalization, and thus improve their utility for predictive sequence design. We explore several strategies to integrate one-hot encodings and mechanistic features into a single predictive model, including feature stacking, ensemble model stacking, and geometric stacking, a novel architecture based on graph convolutional neural networks. Our work casts new light on mechanistic sequence features, underscoring the importance of domain-knowledge and feature engineering for accurate prediction of protein expression levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.