ArticleInternational endodontic journal2025
A novel artificial intelligence-powered tool for automated root canal segmentation in single-rooted teeth on cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulp calcification and pulp canal obliteration: from biological mechanisms to contemporary clinical management and digital navigation.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Practitioners' Perceptions of Augmented and Virtual Reality in Endodontic Treatment Planning: A Pilot Study.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Detecting Residual Root Canal Filling Material After Retreatment: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Microscopy Compared with Microcomputed Tomography.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- AI-generated 3D models enhance CBCT interpretation of root canal anatomy among undergraduate and postgraduate students.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Observational
- Impacts of artificial intelligence on computed tomography in endodontics: an integrative review.BMC oral health · 2026Review
- FDA-Approved AI Solutions in Dental Imaging: A Narrative Review of Applications, Evidence, and Outlook.International dental journal · 2026Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Research Published in Endodontic Journals.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Review
- The Segmentation and 3D Reconstruction of Teeth, Root Canals, and Alveolar Bones in CBCT Images Based on AVIZO Software.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Clinical Benefits and Limitations of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontic Practice: A Contemporary Evidence-Based Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostication in Endodontics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.European endodontic journal · 2025Review
- Comparison of AI-Powered Tools for CBCT-Based Mandibular Incisive Canal Segmentation: A Validation Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- [Study on dental image segmentation and automatic root canal measurement based on multi-stage deep learning using cone beam computed tomography].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Risk Stratification of the Lingual Foramen: A CBCT-Based Prevalence and Morphological Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) in restorative dentistry: current trends and future prospects.BMC oral health · 2025Review
- A novel artificial intelligence-powered tool for automated root canal segmentation in single-rooted teeth on cone-beam computed tomography.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tool based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of root canals in single-rooted teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODOLOGY: A total of 69 CBCT scans were retrospectively recruited from a hospital database and acquired from two devices with varying protocols. These scans were randomly assigned to the training (n = 31, 88 teeth), validation (n = 8, 15 teeth) and testing (n = 30, 120 teeth) sets. For the training and validation data sets, each CBCT scan was imported to the Virtual Patient Creator platform, where manual segmentation of root canals was performed by two operators, establishing the ground truth. Subsequently, the AI model was tested on 30 CBCT scans (120 teeth), and the AI-generated three-dimensional (3D) virtual models were exported in standard triangle language (STL) format. Importantly, the testing data set encompassed different types of single-rooted teeth. An experienced operator evaluated the automated segmentation, and manual refinements were made to create refined 3D models (R-AI). The AI and R-AI models were compared for performance evaluation. Additionally, 30% of the testing sample was manually segmented at two different times to compare AI-based and human segmentation methods. The time taken by each segmentation method to obtain 3D models was recorded in seconds(s) for further comparison.
resultsThe AI-driven tool demonstrated highly accurate segmentation of single-rooted teeth (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] ranging from 89% to 93%; 95% Hausdorff distance [HD] ranging from 0.10 to 0.13 mm), with no significant impact of tooth type on accuracy metrics (p > .05). The AI approach outperformed the manual method (p < .05), showing higher DSC and lower 95% HD values. In terms of time efficiency, manual segmentation required significantly more time (2262.4 ± 679.1 s) compared to R-AI (94 ± 64.7 s) and AI (41.8 ± 12.2 s) methods (p < .05), representing a 54-fold decrease.
conclusionsThe novel AI-based tool exhibited highly accurate and time-efficient performance in the automatic root canal segmentation on CBCT, surpassing the human performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.