ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Relationship between oral health literacy and changes in self-assessment of oral health during COVID-19.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Health literacy is thought to play a major role in implementing health behaviors, such as preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between oral health literacy (OHL), dietary literacy (DL), and changes in oral health and eating habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: The self-assessment questionnaire, including questions on oral and dietary conditions for each period of the COVID-19 pandemic, sources of information, OHL, DL, and frequency of COVID-19 prevention measures, was administered using a web research company. All participants were divided into low- and high-literacy groups based on the median scores: those who scored above the median in the high group and those who scored at or below the median in the low group. Comparisons were conducted between the two groups. Results: The median OHL and DL scores were 16 and 17 for the 344 participants included in the study (168 males and 176 females); 160 (46.5%) participants had high OHL scores, and 157 (45.6%) had high DL scores. The group with high OHL or DL tended to collect information sent by medical professionals compared to the group with low OHL or DL, had significantly higher scores on self-assessment of oral and dietary conditions, and tended to implement infection control actions more frequently in eating situations. Conclusion: The high OHL and DL groups gathered information from professionals to have attain oral and dietary conditions regardless of COVID-19 and tended to implement infection prevention measures in oral health and diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.