ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Deep learning system for the differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions through clinical photographic imaging.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-Guided Mixture-of-Experts with Multimodal LLMs for Lesion Detection in Buccal Mucosa Images.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Impact of language and question types on ChatGPT-4o's performance in answering oral pathology questions from Taiwan National Dental Licensing Examinations.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Application of image enhancement in the auxiliary diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Oral mucosal lesions are associated with a variety of pathological conditions. Most deep-learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) systems for computer-aided diagnosis of oral lesions have typically concentrated on determining limited aspects of differential diagnosis. This study aimed to develop a CNN-based diagnostic model capable of classifying clinical photographs of oral ulcerative and associated lesions into five different diagnoses, thereby assisting clinicians in making accurate differential diagnoses. Materials and methods: A set of clinical images were selected, including 506 images of five different diagnoses. The images were pre-processed and randomly divided into two sets for training and testing the CNN model. The model architecture was composed of convolutional layers, batch normalization layers, max pooling layers, the dropout layer and fully-connected layers. Evaluation metrics included weighted-precision, weighted-recall, weighted-F1 score, average specificity, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, normalized confusion matrix and AUC. Results: The overall performance for the image classification showed a weighted-precision of 88.8%, a weighted-recall of 88.2%, a weighted-F1 score of 0.878, an average pecificity of 97.0%, a Kappa coefficient of 0.851, and an average AUC of 0.985. Conclusion: The model achieved a decent classification performance (overall AUC=0.985), showing the capacity to discern between benign and malignant potential lesions, and laid the foundation of a novel tool that can help clinical differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions. The main challenges were the small and imbalanced dataset. Enlarging the minority classes, incorporating more oral mucosal lesion diagnoses, employing transfer learning and cross-validation might be included in future works to optimize the image classification model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.