ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Establishment and evaluation of a deep learning-based tooth wear severity grading system using intraoral photographs.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated classification of maxillary and mandibular dental views on intraoral photographs: a comparative benchmark study and mobile proof-of-concept.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Assessment of tooth wear with intraoral scanned models in young adults.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Development of an AI model to predict tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Review
- Particularities of Variation of the Dental Wear in Subjects with Cardiovascular Diseases Compared to Subjects without Systemic Diseases.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in medical diagnosis owing to its high accuracy and efficiency. This study aimed to develop a diagnostic system for automatically determining the degree of tooth wear (TW) using intraoral photographs with deep learning. Materials and methods: The study included 388 intraoral photographs. A tooth segmentation model was first established using the Mask R-CNN architecture, which incorporated U-Net and SGE attention mechanisms. Subsequently, 2774 individual tooth images output from the segmentation model were included into the classification task, labeled and randomized into training, validation, and test sets with 6.0:2.0:2.0 ratio. A vision transformer model optimized using a mask mechanism was constructed for TW degree classification. The models were evaluated using the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The time required for AI analysis was calculated. Results: The accuracy of the tooth segmentation model was 0.95. The average accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score in the classification task were 0.93, 0.91, 0.88, and 0.89, respectively. The F1-score differed in different grades (0.97 for grade 0, 0.90 for grade 1, 0.88 for grade 2, and 0.82 for grade 3). No significant difference was observed in the accuracy between different surfaces. The AI system reduced the time required to grade an individual tooth surface to 0.07 s, compared to the 2.67 s required by clinicians. Conclusion: The developed system provides superior accuracy and efficiency in determining TW degree using intraoral photographs. It might assist clinicians in the decision-making for TW treatment and help patients perform self-assessments and disease follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.