ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Influence of operator experience on the complete-arch accuracy and time-based efficiency of three intraoral scanners.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Digital Impressions: A Review of Factors Affecting Intraoral Scanner Accuracy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of dentition alignment, scanning strategy and operator experience on the accuracy and time of intraoral scanning: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions using conventional scanbodies, ScanTransfers, and splinted ScanTransfers: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Cumulative Error in Digital Workflows for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of Maneuverability Constraints on Intraoral Scanner Performance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of restorative materials, colors, and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Trueness and precision analysis of crown margins on digital casts produced by various dental scanning systems.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring the applications of artificial intelligence in various commercial dental professional software.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The performance of intraoral scanners (IOSs) relies on the operator's skills. However, whether operator experience influences IOS accuracy remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of operator experience on the trueness accuracy and time-based efficiency of IOSs. Materials and methods: Thirty operators were equally divided into two groups on the basis of their IOS-handling experience. Each operator performed simulation scans of a maxillary model in a training dummy by using three IOSs: CEREC Omnicam, Primescan, and Aoralscan 3. A total of 90 scans were generated, and the scan time for image acquisition and the render time required for an IOS to generate a three-dimensional image were recorded. The trueness of each scan was calculated by comparing with a reference scan obtained from an industrial high-precision scanner. The Results: For the three IOSs, no significant difference was noted in trueness accuracy, scan time, or render time between inexperienced and experienced operators. For both inexperienced and experienced operators, Omnicam had significantly less accuracy and longer scan time than did the other IOSs; the render time was significantly shorter for Aoralscan 3 than for the other IOSs. Conclusion: Operator experience does not substantially influence the trueness accuracy and time-based efficiency of IOSs; these factors vary across IOS types. The render time for obtaining three-dimensional images is a significant feature for improving the time-based efficiency of IOSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.