ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Membrane-free stem cell components suppress osteoclast differentiation: Implications for oral regenerative treatment.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Membrane-free stem cell components (MFSCCs) have been developed by removing cell membranes with antigens to overcome the limitations associated with cell-based therapies and isolate effective peptides. MFSCCs have been reported to have effects on oral infection sites. Chronic inflammatory diseases cause excessive bone resorption. This study investigated the effects of MFSCCs on osteoclast differentiation in the context of the high prevalence of inflammatory bone resorption. Materials and methods: Bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) were treated with macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand. Osteoclast differentiation was assessed based on the MFSCC concentrations. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-stained mature osteoclasts and multinucleated cells derived from BMMs were analyzed using light microscopy. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of genes related to osteoclast differentiation were measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The relative expression levels of the key transcription factors c-fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1) were determined using quantitative RT-PCR and western blotting. Results: After treatment with MFSCCs, the cell viability was similar, depending on the level of BMMs. As the MFSCC concentration increased, the number of TRAP-positive cells decreased. The mRNA and protein expression of cathepsin K, TRAP, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein, c-fos, and NFATc1 decreased as the MFSCC concentration increased. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that MFSCCs suppress osteoclast differentiation by downregulating transcription factors, particularly, c-fos and NFATc1. Therefore, MFSCCs may serve as a conservative treatment option for chronic inflammatory bone resorption diseases of the oral cavity by suppressing excessive bone resorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.