ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) increases the risk of mortality of critically ill patients. Diagnostic criteria specifically targeting patients in intensive care units(ICUs) have been developed to improve diagnostic sensitivity. This study investigated health outcomes among patients in ICUs with Aspergillus isolates identified using bronchoscopy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from the Chang Gung Research Database of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients admitted to the ICU between January 2017 and December 2022 who received bronchoalveolar lavage were enrolled. Patients with a fungus culture yielding Aspergillus spp. isolates or who had an Aspergillus galactomannan antigen index value of >1.0 were categorized into the Aspergillus-positive group. Results: A total of 2372 patients were enrolled, and 146 patients (6.16%) tested positive for Aspergillus. Of the patients who tested positive for Aspergillus, 37.67% had a positive culture result, and 77.4% had a positive galactomannan antigen result. Patients with Aspergillus isolates were more likely to have a recent influenza infection, concurrent bacterial sepsis, and a cavitation and to die in hospital (in-hospital mortality rate 58.9% vs. 48.57%, P = 0.016). Discussion: Identifying Aspergillus through bronchoscopy in the ICU is associated with higher mortality rates than in patients who test negative for Aspergillus. Galactomannan antigen from bronchoalveolar lavage may provide higher diagnostic sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.