Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024

Analysis and validation of serum biomarkers in brucellosis patients through proteomics and bioinformatics.

Xiao Li, Bo Wang, Xiaocong Li, Juan He, Yue Shi, Rui Wang, Dongwei Li, Ding Haitao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao Li *Department of Inner Mongolia Clinical Medicine College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Bo Wang *Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Xiaocong LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Juan HeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yue ShiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Dongwei LiDepartment of Inner Mongolia Clinical Medicine College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Ding HaitaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to utilize proteomics, bioinformatics, and machine learning algorithms to identify diagnostic biomarkers in the serum of patients with acute and chronic brucellosis. Methods: Proteomic analysis was conducted on serum samples from patients with acute and chronic brucellosis, as well as from healthy controls. Differential expression analysis was performed to identify proteins with altered expression, while Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was applied to detect co-expression modules associated with clinical features of brucellosis. Machine learning algorithms were subsequently used to identify the optimal combination of diagnostic biomarkers. Finally, ELISA was employed to validate the identified proteins. Results: A total of 1,494 differentially expressed proteins were identified, revealing two co-expression modules significantly associated with the clinical characteristics of brucellosis. The Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) algorithm identified six proteins that were concurrently present in both the differentially expressed and co-expression modules, demonstrating promising diagnostic potential. After ELISA validation, five proteins were ultimately selected. Discussion: These five proteins are implicated in the innate immune processes of brucellosis, potentially associated with its pathogenic mechanisms and chronicity. Furthermore, we highlighted their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for brucellosis. This study further enhances our understanding of brucellosis at the protein level, paving the way for future research endeavors.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrucellosisComputational BiologyProteomicsAdultAlgorithmsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProteomeBiomarkersProteomebioinformaticsbiomarkersbrucellosisdifferential expression analysismachine learningproteomicsweighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)

Identifiers

PMID39872944
PMCPMC11769985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.