ArticleCureus2025
Understanding Parental Perspectives on Childhood Hearing Impairment and Timely Interventions.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHearing impairment during childhood is a widespread health issue. Prompt recognition and timely intervention are vital for the advancement of language skills. Insufficient parental knowledge can lead to a delay in diagnosing and treating a condition, which can have a negative impact on academic performance. The goals of our study were to assess the knowledge levels of parents regarding childhood hearing loss and to evaluate their attitudes toward the availability of hearing services.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire. Participants, totaling 339, were recruited from various regions across Saudi Arabia through a stratified random sampling technique to ensure diverse representation. Recruitment was conducted via social media platforms, including Twitter, and WhatsApp. The data were examined using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA) and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 26.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY).
resultThis study consisted of 339 participants, of whom 295 (87.0%) were female. The 41-50 age group was the most represented at 35.7% (121/339). A total of 76.1% of the participants demonstrated inadequate knowledge regarding childhood hearing loss and its connection to developmental delay. Although the participants had limited knowledge, a significant majority of 82.9% expressed a favorable disposition toward hearing services.
conclusionsThis study emphasizes the existence of significant gaps in knowledge and diverse attitudes toward childhood hearing loss among caregivers. This underscores the urgent need for public health initiatives to tackle these gaps through educational and awareness campaigns. By promoting a well-informed and optimistic approach to hearing health, we can improve the results of early detection and intervention, thereby reducing the long-term effects on speech, language, and cognitive development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.